Main improvement area
Jawline (78/100)
Jaw angle 121deg differs from the 100deg target by more than 10deg.
Personalized upgrade blueprint
Your Personalized Refinement Plan
Your face already has a refined base. Treat jawline as a polish area while your eyes remain a strength.
Score outlook
+5–7 presentation liftCurrent
79/100
Estimated presentation potential
84–86/100
Strong base. The highest leverage is improving how your features read together.
Based on your current result and the highest-impact framing, grooming, and presentation changes in this plan. A new photo determines the actual result, so results vary.
Start here
Your report at a glance
What needs attention, what already works, and the first move to test.
Top strength
Eyes (84/100)
At 84/100, this is your strongest current category and should be preserved while you test the first step.
First focus
Use soft styling for the measured jaw angle
Start with this measured action, keep it unchanged through day 14, then add the Week 3 supporting refinement before considering optional changes.
Why this is the priority
Best supported next step
Jaw angle 121.0deg differs from the 100deg goal-aware reference by more than 10deg.
Test one core change at a time and keep comparison conditions stable. Optional tools later in the report only support the accepted plan; they are never required.
How to read your scores
Scores are placement, not grades.
- Placement, not grades. Scores describe this photo, not your worth or a clinical grade.
- Average is not a verdict. The typical range is a reference, not a ceiling.
- Presentation vs geometry. Grooming and presentation can change what shows, not measured facial geometry.
- One photo limits some readings. Where a measurement needs a side photo, the report says so.
Your harmony profile
A six-dimension view of how your overall score and measured facial areas relate. The chart uses the scores shown above to reveal the overall pattern at a glance.
How to read the shape
1
Wider points
Areas that currently read stronger relative to the rest of your profile.
2
Inward points
Lower relative areas that may deserve attention; the summary above determines the actual priority.
3
Compare consistently
Use similar lighting, camera distance, expression, and head angle when tracking change.
This profile summarizes visible structure in this photo. Lighting, camera distance, expression, and head angle can affect individual scores.
Your face, mirrored
Each comparison straightens sideways head tilt, then repeats one half of this exact photo. It makes normal left-right differences easier to notice without changing your underlying measurements.
Swipe to compare all three views →
UnalteredOriginal photo
Left side mirrored
Right side mirrored
Left and right refer to the sides of the photo. The original stays unaltered; the mirror views only correct detected sideways tilt before comparison. Expression, pose, lighting, and camera perspective can still exaggerate differences. These views are explanatory only and do not add a new score or diagnosis.
Start here: your next 3 steps
Follow these milestones in order. The rest of the report explains the score, why each action was chosen, and what to save for later.
Do this first, tonight
Use soft styling for the measured jaw angle
The cheapest, reversible first move for your weakest area (Cheekbones). Full instructions are in the ordered plan below.
1Week 1
Use soft styling for the measured jaw angle
Blend a very light matte shadow only beneath the rear third of the jaw and fully into the neck; keep blush slightly high and outward. Use soft face-framing that stays close to the jaw instead of adding a hard contour line.
2Day 14
Compare before adding another change
After 14 days, compare your first and latest front-facing photos with the same distance, lighting, and camera height.
3Week 3
Standardize asymmetry before styling around it
For 14 days, keep your head level and use even front lighting. Keep brow and face-framing details equally consistent on both sides. If you use a hair part, keep its placement unchanged throughout the comparison.
4-Week Improvement Roadmap
Build one controlled change at a time, check progress on day 14, and finish with a repeatable four-week comparison.
Week 1
Set the baseline
Capture neutral front and side photos, then begin the primary step: Blend a very light matte shadow only beneath the rear third of the jaw and fully into the neck; keep blush slightly high and outward.
Week 2Checkpoint
Stabilize jawline
You can keep the Week 1 setup unchanged. On day 14, repeat the same photos and check only whether the lower face reads more deliberately balanced while the underlying jaw angle remains unchanged.
14-day progress checkpoint
Week 3
Refine symmetry
You can keep the successful primary change and adjust only one small variable based on the day-14 comparison.
Week 4Checkpoint
Compare and keep what works
Repeat the baseline photos under the same conditions. You can keep only the changes that visibly improved jawline and symmetry, then set the next four-week focus.
Four-week review
Consistency rules
1Primary focus (Jaw angle): Set the lower-face framing once, maintain clean edges as needed, and keep the shape unchanged for 14 days.
2Secondary focus (Left-right measurements): Keep pose, lighting, and left-right grooming consistent at every check-in.
3Consistency rule: keep the primary styling step unchanged through day 14, then add only one supporting refinement in Week 3.
4Progress check: compare neutral front-facing photos on days 1, 14, and 28 using the same camera, lighting, expression, and hairstyle.
14-day proof checkpoint
After 14 days, compare your first and latest front-facing photos with the same distance, lighting, and camera height.
Check only the supported outcomes: the lower face reads more deliberately balanced while the underlying jaw angle remains unchanged; left-right balance reads more consistently, and any remaining difference is easier to judge fairly.
Separately, take one optional presentation photo at a slight three-quarter angle with the camera at eye level or just above and soft directional light. You can keep it separate from score comparison.
Use day 14 as the midpoint decision. Carry visible improvements into Weeks 3–4, then add only one supporting change.
Top Strengths
Keep these intact while you work through the refinement plan.
Your eye size sits in a refined range, helping the upper face carry attention naturally.
Your mouth-to-face proportion supports the lower half of the face and adds to the overall balance.
Your eyes score is 84/100 and does not need a corrective step in this plan.
Trait balance
Your Trait-Balance Archetype
High Harmony, Soft Structure
Your overall balance is led by symmetry and proportions more than sharp structure.
This pattern works through harmony rather than maximum jaw or cheekbone definition. One softer structural category is only part of the result; proportion, expression, and styling can carry the overall impression.
Your cheekbones score does not define the whole face. Your overall impression comes from the balance between eyes and your softer-scoring areas.
Public figure style inspiration
Editorial examples of styling that often supports a comparable trait emphasis. Compare the styling approach, not the person.
Emma Watson
styling often emphasizes balanced proportions and softer structural harmony
Selena Gomez
styling often uses soft framing and feature harmony rather than sharp structure
Style note
A trait balance like yours is often styled with even, low-contrast framing that keeps soft structure uncluttered. Focus this on your lead area: Jawline.
Public figure names are used only as general, editorially selected style references. Lookmax Analyzer is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any mentioned public figure. These are not identity matches, endorsements, or lookalike claims.
Eye area · measured profile
Your eye-area profile
Almond · Upturned · Balanced spacing
Your visible eye opening is closest to the almond band. Corner orientation and spacing are separate traits, so they do not change the opening label.
Opening shape
Almond
3.04× width to height
Corner direction
Upturned
+6.1° after roll correction
Eye spacing
Balanced spacing
0.46 eye-gap ratio
Optional lid-fold self-check
Which description looks closest?
Face landmarks trace the lid margins, not the upper-lid crease. Compare your relaxed eyes with these descriptions and choose only when one feels clear.
Styling interpretation
Optional reference for after your current four-week plan. Liner, lashes, and shadow can carry more visible contrast while preserving the natural opening.
Hooded adjustment: Keep liner close to the lash line and place emphasis slightly above the natural fold. Self-reported.
Eyeliner
A thin line that gradually strengthens toward the outer third follows the almond opening without overpowering it.
Eyeshadow
Centered placement preserves openness, while a restrained outer gradient emphasizes the natural taper.
Brow framing
Natural fullness with a clean tapered tail frames the eye while preserving its measured direction.
Opening, corner direction, and spacing come from the photo. Lid fold is optional, explicitly self-reported, and never changes your Eyes or overall score.
Nose & midface · measured
Central width and centerline
These readings connect visible midface length, nasal width, and centerline position so the evidence used by your plan stays visible.
Cropped from your uploaded photo. Cyan lines show the geometry used for the readings beside it.
Nose Width to Face Width
0.30
In rangePhoto readingReference 0.27-0.32
Nose Width to Eye Gap
1.22
In rangePhoto readingReference 1.1-1.36
Nose Centerline
0.014
In rangePhoto readingReference < 0.03
In short
Preserve this balance
The available readings sit inside their contextual reference bands. Nothing in this region needs to become a priority on its own.
Photo geometry only. Reference bands describe measured relationships; they are not diagnoses, attractiveness grades, or instructions to alter anatomy.
Lips & smile · measured
Width, lip balance, and levelness
The crop connects mouth width, upper-to-lower lip balance, and visible mouth angle without treating expression as permanent anatomy.
Cropped from your uploaded photo. Cyan lines show the geometry used for the readings beside it.
Mouth Width Balance
0.36
In rangePhoto readingReference 0.3-0.36
Mouth Levelness
0.8°
In rangePhoto readingReference < 2deg
Philtrum Length
Relative to lower-face height
0.24 ratio
BalancedPhoto readingReference 0.18-0.26
In short
Preserve this balance
The available readings sit inside their contextual reference bands. Nothing in this region needs to become a priority on its own.
Photo geometry only. Reference bands describe measured relationships; they are not diagnoses, attractiveness grades, or instructions to alter anatomy.
Jaw & chin · measured
Lower-face structure and support
Jaw angle, corner shape, and visible chin height explain how the lower face reads in this photo. They are interpreted together, not as isolated ideals.
Cropped from your uploaded photo. Cyan lines show the geometry used for the readings beside it.
Jaw Angle
121°
ReviewPhoto readingReference 90-110deg
Jaw Corner Angle
Average angle at the left and right jaw corners
121°
Near rangePhoto readingReference 126-147deg
Chin Projection
Forward-depth estimate; separate from vertical lower-face share
0.01 projection offset
In rangePhoto readingReference -0.18-0.045
In short
Review this cue
Your jaw angle is one of the clearer lower-face structure measurements.
Linked action: Blend a very light matte shadow only beneath the rear third of the jaw and fully into the neck; keep blush slightly high and outward. Use soft face-framing that stays close to the jaw instead of adding a hard contour line.
Photo geometry only. Reference bands describe measured relationships; they are not diagnoses, attractiveness grades, or instructions to alter anatomy.
Hairstyle Direction
A conservative hairstyle direction based on visible face proportions.
Hairstyle direction unavailable from this photo
This scan does not contain enough stable contour measurements. Use a level, front-facing photo with the full chin and both sides of the face visible.
Priority Areas
Jawline (78/100)
Start herePrimary refinement
Why this matters: Controlled contrast changes where the jaw boundary attracts attention without pretending to alter bone structure.
Evidence: Jaw angle 121deg differs from the 100deg target by more than 10deg.
MeasuredJaw angle 121· ref 90–110°
Visible outcome: The lower face reads more deliberately balanced while the underlying jaw angle remains unchanged.
Placement · Modeled typical range 52–80Modeled reference from the face-score distribution — a band, not a ceiling.
Symmetry (81/100)
Supporting styling refinement
Why this matters: Stable pose, lighting, and grooming prevent presentation from exaggerating the measured asymmetry.
Evidence: The scan found mouth cant 0.8deg outside the conservative symmetry gates.
MeasuredMouth cant 0.8· ref <0.7°
Visible outcome: Left-right balance reads more consistently, and any remaining difference is easier to judge fairly.
Placement · Modeled typical range 52–80Modeled reference from the face-score distribution — a band, not a ceiling.
Cheekbones (76/100)
Presentation only
Why this matters: Your face reads slightly softer than your structure allows in front-view photos.
Evidence: Cheekbones scored 76/100 and was selected as a refinement category.
Visible outcome: Cheek structure reads clearer without implying a major structural change
Placement · Modeled typical range 52–80Modeled reference from the face-score distribution — a band, not a ceiling.
Your Action Plan
Start with step 1 and keep it unchanged through the day-14 checkpoint before adding the Week 3 refinement.
Customize advice (optional)
Hair
1Use soft styling for the measured jaw angle
Start hereImpact: MediumWell-supported
Focus: Controlled contrast changes where the jaw boundary attracts attention without pretending to alter bone structure.
Evidence: Jaw angle 121deg differs from the 100deg target by more than 10deg.
Do this: Blend a very light matte shadow only beneath the rear third of the jaw and fully into the neck; keep blush slightly high and outward. Use soft face-framing that stays close to the jaw instead of adding a hard contour line.
The lower face reads more deliberately balanced while the underlying jaw angle remains unchanged.
2Standardize asymmetry before styling around it
Supporting styling refinementWell-supported
Focus: Stable pose, lighting, and grooming prevent presentation from exaggerating the measured asymmetry.
Evidence: The scan found mouth cant 0.8deg outside the conservative symmetry gates.
Do this: For 14 days, keep your head level and use even front lighting. Keep brow and face-framing details equally consistent on both sides. If you use a hair part, keep its placement unchanged throughout the comparison.
Left-right balance reads more consistently, and any remaining difference is easier to judge fairly.
3Make existing mid-face definition read clearer
Presentation onlyWell-supported
Focus: Your face reads slightly softer than your structure allows in front-view photos.
Evidence: Cheekbones scored 76/100 and was selected as a refinement category.
Do this: Use softer directional lighting, avoid overexposure, keep the camera at eye level, and use subtle hair or color framing when relevant
Why These Actions Were ChosenView evidenceHide evidence
Use this section for the measurement, reasoning, and exact execution behind each action in your four-week roadmap.
Evidence-backed refinements
Use soft styling for the measured jaw angle
Impact: MediumWell-supported
Evidence: Jaw angle 121deg differs from the 100deg target by more than 10deg.
Your face now: Jaw angle 121.0deg differs from the 100deg goal-aware reference by more than 10deg.
Why it matters: Controlled contrast changes where the jaw boundary attracts attention without pretending to alter bone structure.
The lower face reads more deliberately balanced while the underlying jaw angle remains unchanged.
How to do it: Test the styling on one side first in normal indoor light, compare both sides, then repeat only the placement that improves balance. Keep the same placement for the 14-day comparison.
Visible result: The lower face reads more deliberately balanced while the underlying jaw angle remains unchanged.
Standardize asymmetry before styling around it
Supporting styling refinementWell-supported
Evidence: The scan found mouth cant 0.8deg outside the conservative symmetry gates.
Your face now: A left-right measurement crossed its review gate; this step tests how much of the visible difference comes from repeatable presentation.
Why it matters: Stable pose, lighting, and grooming prevent presentation from exaggerating the measured asymmetry.
Left-right balance reads more consistently, and any remaining difference is easier to judge fairly.
How to do it: Use the same neutral head position and even lighting on days 1 and 14. Keep brow and face-framing details equally consistent on both sides. If you use a hair part, keep its placement unchanged throughout the comparison.
Visible result: Left-right balance reads more consistently, and any remaining difference is easier to judge fairly.
Presentation optimizations
Make existing mid-face definition read clearer
Presentation onlyWell-supported
Evidence: Cheekbones scored 76/100 and was selected as a refinement category.
Your face now: Your cheek definition is decent, though it can disappear under flat or overhead light.
Why it matters: Your face reads slightly softer than your structure allows in front-view photos.
How to do it: For photos, use soft directional light instead of flat front light, avoid overexposure, keep the camera at eye level, and compare one repeat shot each week.
Visible result: Cheek structure reads clearer without implying a major structural change
Expected Result
Follow the four-week roadmap: hold the primary action through day 14, add one supporting refinement in Week 3, and make the final comparison after Week 4. These refinements may change framing and presentation; measured anatomy is not expected to change.
What to look for: observe each outcome in your own neutral before/after photos using the same camera, distance, lighting, expression, and hairstyle. These are qualitative effects to compare, not guaranteed score changes — score potential stays in the outlook card above.
- The lower face reads more deliberately balanced while the underlying jaw angle remains unchanged.
- Left-right balance reads more consistently, and any remaining difference is easier to judge fairly.
- Cheek structure reads clearer without implying a major structural change
Put your plan into practice
Your everyday routine & style kit
A practical foundation based on your selected goal and measured report. Photo insights refine it when available. Use what you already own; every tool below is optional.
Your routine
General baseline
GeneralUse broad-spectrum SPF 30+ on exposed skin and follow the product directions. · Remove sunscreen and styling residue with a gentle cleanser; avoid aggressive scrubbing. · Use a plain moisturizer when skin feels dry or tight, and stop any product that irritates it.
Optional kit
Wide-tooth comb
Helps set direction while preserving natural separation and texture.
Use for “Everyday grooming”: Use only when it makes your normal grooming more repeatable.
Brow spoolie
Keeps the recommended brow direction visible before removing any hair.
Use for “Everyday grooming”: Use only when it makes your normal grooming more repeatable.
Style picks
Keep the framing balanced
Use a controlled silhouette and avoid letting one styling element dominate the face.
Balanced presentation works best when the overall face remains the focal point.
Protect your eyes strength
When testing a new look, change one visible element at a time and preserve the framing that already works.
Eyes is your strongest displayed structural category.
Optional frames to try
Frame fit starts from your measured tendency — Oval / Oblong. Compare contrasting shapes and prioritize width and bridge comfort over any single rule. Compare these as style options under the same lighting.
Measured tendency: Oval / Oblong · Medium confidence
Round
A softer curved outline to compare with angular options.
Oval
A taller lens shape for longer or narrower faces.
Wayfarer
A structured upper rim with an easy everyday shape.
Photo-ready checklist
Use the same setup when comparing changes so lighting and camera position do not decide the result for you.
- Use soft, even front light and avoid a bright source directly above you.
- Keep the camera near eye level and use the same distance for comparisons.
- Compare one styling change at a time with a relaxed, neutral expression.
See more Looksmax Analyzer examples
Follow the TikTok for feature breakdowns, report examples, and product updates.